By Reich, L. J. and Veira, D. M. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. and Weary, D. M., Journal of Dairy Science, 2010
Research Paper Web Link / URL:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030210001293
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030210001293
Description
The objective was to determine the effect of sawdust bedding dry matter on the lying behavior of Holstein cows. Dry matter (DM) was varied systematically over 5 treatment levels to test how cows respond to damp bedding. This experiment was repeated during summer and winter to test if the effects of damp bedding varied with season. The 5 bedding treatments averaged (±SD) 89.8 ± 3.7, 74.2 ± 6.4, 62.2 ± 6.3, 43.9 ± 4.0, and 34.7 ± 3.8% DM. Over the course of the trial, minimum and maximum temperatures in the barn were 2.6 ± 2.0 and 6.8 ± 2.2°C in the winter and 13.3 ± 2.5 and 22.6 ± 4.1°C in the summer. In both seasons, 5 groups of 3 nonlactating cows were housed in free stalls bedded with sawdust. Following a 5-d acclimation period on dry bedding, groups were exposed to the 5 bedding treatments in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Each treatment lasted 4 d, followed by 1 d when the cows were provided with dry bedding. Stall usage was assessed by 24-h video scanned at 5-min intervals. Responses were analyzed within group (n = 5) as the observational unit. Bedding DM affected lying time, averaging 10.4 ± 0.4 h/d on the wettest treatment and increasing to 11.5 ± 0.4 h/d on the driest bedding. Lying time varied with season, averaging 12.1 ± 0.4 h/d across treatments during the winter and 9.9 ± 0.6 h/d during the summer, but season and bedding DM did not interact. These results indicate that access to dry bedding is important for dairy cows.
The objective was to determine the effect of sawdust bedding dry matter on the lying behavior of Holstein cows. Dry matter (DM) was varied systematically over 5 treatment levels to test how cows respond to damp bedding. This experiment was repeated during summer and winter to test if the effects of damp bedding varied with season. The 5 bedding treatments averaged (±SD) 89.8 ± 3.7, 74.2 ± 6.4, 62.2 ± 6.3, 43.9 ± 4.0, and 34.7 ± 3.8% DM. Over the course of the trial, minimum and maximum temperatures in the barn were 2.6 ± 2.0 and 6.8 ± 2.2°C in the winter and 13.3 ± 2.5 and 22.6 ± 4.1°C in the summer. In both seasons, 5 groups of 3 nonlactating cows were housed in free stalls bedded with sawdust. Following a 5-d acclimation period on dry bedding, groups were exposed to the 5 bedding treatments in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Each treatment lasted 4 d, followed by 1 d when the cows were provided with dry bedding. Stall usage was assessed by 24-h video scanned at 5-min intervals. Responses were analyzed within group (n = 5) as the observational unit. Bedding DM affected lying time, averaging 10.4 ± 0.4 h/d on the wettest treatment and increasing to 11.5 ± 0.4 h/d on the driest bedding. Lying time varied with season, averaging 12.1 ± 0.4 h/d across treatments during the winter and 9.9 ± 0.6 h/d during the summer, but season and bedding DM did not interact. These results indicate that access to dry bedding is important for dairy cows.
We welcome and encourage discussion of our linked research papers. Registered users can post their comments here. New users' comments are moderated, so please allow a while for them to be published.